In this article, we delve into a detailed analysis of 36,926 user reviews from various languages worldwide to examine the AKG D5. This analysis is performed by the RR artificial intelligence and updated daily with newly submitted reviews. The RR AI utilizes a complex algorithm to first scrutinize user reviews for credibility, filtering out unreliable ones. It then proceeds to dissect and evaluate the valuable insights within these reviews, providing users with ratings regarding the features of this product. Based on these assessments, users can make informed decisions about whether this product is suitable for them or not.
These results are a summary of user reviews of the AKG D5. For example, 94% of 10,661 users who have commented on the Value for money of the AKG D5 have given positive feedback.
Showing 21 to 39 of 39 Reviews
Reviewed by Guil J. on Reverb
This is it. Forget about the SM58s. This mic has better clarity, output and sounds warmer than others in it's class. I've owned many mics and this mic blows them all out. Buy it now!
Reviewed by Brad M. on Reverb
This is a great performance vocal mic. I love the clarity, beats SM58 and edges out Senn e835 for the price (at least to my ears).
Reviewed by David B. on Reverb
Great Microphone, delivered on time. Only slight negative is that this one does not have an inside windscreen for it. I have been putting using an external windscreen on it, because it will "pop" on me otherwise.
Reviewed by Brian H. on Reverb
I like the output and clarity of this mic. It offers more gain, sensitivity and dynamics than say an SM58. It does take some time and technique to get used to using it live to avoid pops due to plosives.
Reviewed by Richard R. on B&H Photo Video
Just used it in a Deposition and worked perfect. Audio from mike this has a full range as promised in the specs.
Reviewed by sleman on B&H Photo Video
Great sound on vocals, if only that on/off switch was recessed like the SM58, this would be the perfect mic. It's a pain to turn on/off.
Reviewed by FOFO on Guitar Center
I LOVE D5...
Reviewed by MrJfunk on Guitar Center
Needed a wired microphone while djaying and this mic is awesome, clear and very durable. Had to get the switch option for sure. Highly recommend.
Reviewed by Paul J. on Reverb
The clarity and overall quality of this microphone is fantastic for the price. I recommended to any musician/ vocalist that does a lot of live performing.
Reviewed by Kevin on B&H Photo Video
$99 for the kit and good sound !!!
Reviewed by Nic on B&H Photo Video
Great price on pkg.
Reviewed by Rob Spomja on B&H Photo Video
I have tried most mice and this is the only one that suits my needs for both male and female vocals
Reviewed by Rvelez on B&H Photo Video
Website was easy to use. Delivery was quick and price was better.
Reviewed by Bob on B&H Photo Video
I use this for beatboxing and all around it is perfect.
Reviewed by Novice on Guitar Center
Great sounding mic and at a reasonable cost!!!
Reviewed by Ram Nayar on Guitar Center
A powerful but very bright sounding mic. I bought it mainly for male lead vocals thinking that the brightness of the mic would be a good match for bass heavy male lead vocals. Even after adjusting EQ, sound still borders on sharp but annoyingly flat. Not much depth. The mic also runs pretty hot so prone to instant feedback especially when near speakers or monitors so that creates additional challenges in a live environment. Overall not a bad mic but I still prefer the SM58 which is not as powerful (you have to crank it up) but a warmer sounding mic and easier to handle in a live setting. ... More
Reviewed by Peer H. on Reverb
good
Reviewed by Kim D. on Reverb
HI, the microphone works great. thanks kim
Reviewed by hunter on Guitar Center
this is an ok mic. The freq response is pretty expansive but it lacks clarity in the mids-highs...somewhat "muddled". Don't misunderstand me, it's not a bad mic, i was just hoping for more. I'll stick with my atm410...ive been using it for almost two years and it blows the akg away. Overall, I would give the d5 2.5 stars if that was an option.